Member-only story

Why Earmarks Are Good For American Democracy

Francis Turner

·13.8k Followers· Follow

Published in Cheese Factories On The Moon: Why Earmarks Are Good For American Democracy

6 min read · 1 week before

993 View Claps

54 Respond

Save

Listen

Earmarks are a way for members of Congress to direct federal funds to specific projects in their districts. They have been criticized as wasteful and corrupt, but they can also be a valuable tool for democracy.

This article argues that earmarks are good for American democracy because they allow members of Congress to be more responsive to their constituents, they help to spread the benefits of federal spending more evenly across the country, and they can help to build relationships between members of Congress from different parties.

Cheese Factories on the Moon: Why Earmarks are Good for American Democracy

by Scott A. Frisch

4.4 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	1774 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	177 pages

How Earmarks Work

Earmarks are included in appropriations bills, which are the bills that Congress passes to fund the federal government. Earmarks typically specify a specific project, such as a new road or school, and the amount of money that will be allocated to the project.

To get an earmark, members of Congress must submit a request to the appropriations committee. The committee then reviews the request and decides whether or not to include the earmark in the appropriations bill.

Earmarks are controversial because they can be used to fund projects that are not in the national interest. However, earmarks can also be used to fund projects that are important to local communities and that would not be funded otherwise.

The Benefits of Earmarks

There are several benefits to earmarks. First, earmarks allow members of Congress to be more responsive to their constituents. By directing federal funds to specific projects in their districts, members of Congress can help to meet the needs of their constituents and improve their quality of life.

Second, earmarks help to spread the benefits of federal spending more evenly across the country. Without earmarks, federal funds would tend to flow to areas with large populations and powerful politicians. Earmarks help to ensure that all parts of the country receive their fair share of federal funding.

Third, earmarks can help to build relationships between members of Congress from different parties. By working together to secure earmarks for their districts, members of Congress from different parties can develop relationships of trust and cooperation. These relationships can help to improve the functioning of Congress and make it more effective.

The Criticisms of Earmarks

There are also several criticisms of earmarks. First, earmarks can be used to fund projects that are not in the national interest. For example, members of Congress have been known to earmark funds for projects that benefit their own businesses or the businesses of their friends and family.

Second, earmarks can lead to waste and inefficiency. Because earmarks are often included in appropriations bills at the last minute, there is often not enough time to properly vet the projects that are funded. This can lead to projects being funded that are not necessary or that are not well-planned.

Third, earmarks can create a culture of corruption. By giving members of Congress the power to direct federal funds to specific projects, earmarks create opportunities for corruption. Members of Congress may be tempted to use earmarks to reward donors or to punish political opponents.

Reforming Earmarks

Despite the criticisms, earmarks can be a valuable tool for democracy. However, there are several reforms that could be made to earmarks to address the concerns that have been raised.

Earmarks should be subject to a competitive bidding process. This would help to ensure that only the most worthy projects are funded.
Earmarks should be subject to independent review. This would help to ensure that earmarks are not used to fund projects that are not in the national interest.
Earmarks should be limited in size. This would help to prevent earmarks from being used to fund large-scale projects that could have a negative impact on the economy.

By implementing these reforms, we can preserve the benefits of earmarks while addressing the concerns that have been raised.

This article has argued that earmarks are good for democracy because they allow members of Congress to be more responsive to their constituents, they help to spread the benefits of federal spending more evenly across the country, and they can help to build relationships between members of Congress from different parties.

However, there are also legitimate concerns about earmarks. These concerns can be addressed by reforming earmarks to make them more transparent, competitive, and accountable.

By implementing these reforms, we can preserve the benefits of earmarks while addressing the concerns that have been raised.

Cheese Factories on the Moon: Why Earmarks are Good for American Democracy

by Scott A. Frisch

4.4 out of 5